| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
liascm  New Forum Member Joined: 30 Sep 2008 Total posts: 2 Gender: Unknown
|
|
my specs:
8gb ram
768 mb NVIDIA® GeForce™ 9600 GS with PureVideo® HD technology
1 terobite hard drive
2.4ghz processor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mel wilson Forum Moderator - Master member Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Total posts: 2481 Location: England, Biggin Hill, (EGKB) Age: 63 Gender: Male
|
|
Better than most with those stats.........I'm sure we would all love to see some fab screenshots... post a couple up, so we can see FSX as it should be... 
Mel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cat1Forum Moderator - Master member Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Total posts: 1501 Location: KFTW (Meacham Intl, Ft. Worth) Age: 40 Gender: Male
|
|
| Only way to know for sure is to slide all the sliders to the right and fly it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
heeshung SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Total posts: 571
|
|
To be blunt and honest, no. Not even close. If you run at 640x480, you might be able to reach 20 FPS.
Last edited by heeshung on Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:43 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tropicalfish Addict to SurClaro Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Total posts: 989 Age: 5 Gender: Male
|
|
What processor?
2.4ghz is not enough info... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
heeshungSurClaro senior forum member Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Total posts: 571
|
|
No difference. Even if he were on a $1020 Core 2 Extreme QX6850, his 9600GT would still be a bottleneck.
What resolution you run it will drastically affect your graphics settings. However, like I said before, even at 640x480, I doubt you'll be able to achieve 25FPS on Ultra High.
Without ultra high quality however, you'll be able to play FSX just fine. If you want to see how it will run before you buy it, just get the FSX demo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mel wilsonForum Moderator - Master member Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Total posts: 2481 Location: England, Biggin Hill, (EGKB) Age: 63 Gender: Male
|
|
Somehow guys..... I have my doubts we will see any screenshots, that's why I posed the question in the first place, if i had that rig with those specs, then, I at least would have tried it before asking the question........
He's the man on the ground, he should already know !
Mel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tropicalfishAddict to SurClaro Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Total posts: 989 Age: 5 Gender: Male
|
|
Ahh, FSX. I didn't notice that.
FS9, pretty well. FSX? Not very well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
heeshungSurClaro senior forum member Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Total posts: 571
|
|
| Yep, like tropicalfish said, on FS9, pretty well, but on FSX Ultra High, in a word, horribly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
viche12345Addict to SurClaro Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Total posts: 849 Location: San Diego, CA, USA Age: 19 Gender: Male
|
|
| heeshung wrote: | No difference. Even if he were on a $1020 Core 2 Extreme QX6850, his 9600GT would still be a bottleneck.
|
It's the 9600GS, heeshung, not the GT. This should definitely lead to a bottleneck.
With DX10, Ultra High graphics isn't necessary at all. You can produce rather nice screenshots with that new rig of yours. Just remember to turn off AA when needed. You can turn it back on temporarily if you want to impress us with a stunning screenshot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
