| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pcpilot-767  New Forum Member Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Total posts: 5 Gender: Unknown
|
|
| i was wondering what an average climb rate for a boeing 777 is and for any other jet i might add ( in feet per minute) because i was flying southwest and i noticed we got up to 10000 pretty quick after departure so i was wondering what u guys fly as a vertical speed while climbing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tropicalfish  SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Total posts: 799 Age: 3 Gender: Male
| |
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shankar  SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Total posts: 331 Location: Thiruvananthapuram, India (VOTV) Age: 43 Gender: Male
|
|
| I believe climb rate is not directly selected using vertical speed. After you rotate and gear up, you set engines to climbout power and select the appropriate nose up attitude to achieve recommended climbout speed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
09El_Boissevain  Addict to SurClaro Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Total posts: 838 Location: Cairo, Egypt Age: 17 Gender: Male
 |
|
I beleive that from 0-10,000ft climb rate is normally 2500. Then from 10,000 -> 18,000 it is 2000. 18,000 to cruise height 1300 - 500 depending on power and speed.
Captain El |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Max  SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Total posts: 673 Location: LQSA Age: 43 Gender: Male
 |
|
Incorrect, incorrect and incorrect!
First of all, there is no standard climb rate. After takeoff power has been applied, the airplane will rotate at a certain speed and continue the initial climbout at takeoff power reaching speed V2+10, then pitching up to maintain that particular speed with takeoff power still applied. After climbing through 400 feet above ground, that speed will be reduced to Climb (or Climb derate thrust according to noise abatement proc) and the airplane will, obviously continue at a slower rate of climb, because less thrust is provided by the engines. Speed is usually 250 knots below 10.000 feet, however that is bypassed by the heavy freight 747's whose clean maneuvering speed is more then that (~270 knots).
It goes the same for a descent. The Top Of Descent (or the TOD point) will be calculated so that the airplane will have an un-interupted descent all the way down, and furthermore, with engines safely throttled down to flight idle. That way, maximum fuel economy is acheived. The airplane is most economic (miles travelled per 1000 lbs of fuel for example) in a straight and level cruise at it's optimum altitude for the given gross weight. And the airplane is best to be kept at that for as long as possible. Furthermore, descending with IDLE thrust is also fuel saving. As a conclusion, the descent rate is primairly calculated so the airplane maintains the commanded speed with engines at flight idle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vincentgoa3105  New Forum Member Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Total posts: 31 Location: India Gender: Male
|
|
Climb rate is good around 1800fpm thats when you get the best fuel efficiency too. You can have a look at the amount of fuel being burned having different climb rates.
I on full load sometimes accelerate around 245 knots KIAS and then keep the climb rate at around 2000fpm to 2200 fpm max. Too high climb rate and stall is imminent at whatever speed you try to take it up, the plane will eventually run out of power and start reducing speed drastically and then taking you into an uncontrolled descent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skipperdan  Forum Moderator - Master member Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Total posts: 1154 Location: Florida Age: 62 Gender: Male
|
|
As usual, MAX is right on. The answer to the original question should be answered in speed rather than feet per minute.
I am so glad that we have people like MAX who can set us straight.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Max  SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Total posts: 673 Location: LQSA Age: 43 Gender: Male
 |
|
| vincentgoa3105 wrote: | | Climb rate is good around 1800fpm thats when you get the best fuel efficiency too. You can have a look at the amount of fuel being burned having different climb rates. |
I would like to point out that this is completely incorrect.
Best fuel economy can closely be achieved by adjusting the vertical speed for the ECON climb speed that is calculated against the airplane's weight and weather conditions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vincentgoa3105  New Forum Member Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Total posts: 31 Location: India Gender: Male
|
|
| Thanks Max for correcting me on the fuel efficiency. Your answer is correct. Its speed thats important, not directly the climb rate for efficiency. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
serfatplap  New Forum Member Joined: 18 Jul 2007 Total posts: 12 Location: on a nice comfy chair Age: 14 Gender: Male
|
|
| your fpm depends on your aircrafts power to weight ratio,stall speed,and amount of flaps a cessna will climbout at about 1500fpm aleast i do on a 747 I will do about 1800 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mel wilson  Forum Moderator - Master member Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Total posts: 1694 Location: England, Biggin Hill, (EGKB) Age: 62 Gender: Male
|
|
| serfatplap wrote: | | your fpm depends on your aircrafts power to weight ratio,stall speed,and amount of flaps a cessna will climbout at about 1500fpm aleast i do on a 747 I will do about 1800 |
Wow, this is an old post............. As for me, get off the deck, point your nose to the stars........ and stamp your foot on the gas..............
Mel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zerokury  New Forum Member Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Total posts: 9 Gender: Unknown
|
|
| you worry too much guys.. on a 777 you can just turn the autopilot on, set altitude according to the flight, the vertical speed between 1500 and 2000 depending on your patience, speed 250 and voila! the plane will do what's needed.. they're pretty smart actually... sit back and take a snooze. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
heeshung  SurClaro senior forum member Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Total posts: 504
|
|
Well, to some people it seems that we're worrying too much, looking at V1 speeds, rotation speeds, or doing things that don't make any difference at all in FS2004. To some, it seems the people who do those things are just making it complicated.
Sure, you can set your altitude and set a VS and A/T and let the A/P do its thing, but some people ask, "Where's the fun in that?". Where's the fun in setting the autopilot with a couple clicks and "sitting back and taking a snooze"? They strive to be as realistic as possible, even if flight sim gives them an easier way out.
Personally, I believe that that's the way those people like to fly, and they enjoy it that way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|